Review Forms

Review Forms

The journal has two review forms depending on the type of work

 

Review form (articles)

Global Appreciation

  1. The overall quality of the article is: *
  2. The article requires revision: *
  3. The relevance of the paper to the theme of the call for papers and the journal's scope is:*

Originality

  1. For its originality and theoretical and empirical or both contributions to the field of Cultural Studies, this article is: *

Justifications

  1. The article's description of the reasons behind the research, including its relevance to the field of Cultural Studies, is: *

Theoretical background

  1. In light of its coherence, clarity, and relevance to the subject explored, the theoretical grounding of this article is: *

Methodology

  1. The methodological approaches in this article are: *

Conclusions

  1. On clarity and consistency, the conclusions drawn are: *

Style

  1. As for the academic style, journal citation standards, title, and abstract appropriateness, this article is: *

Presentation

  1. The way the article is presented, organised and written is:*

Detailed review for the authors*

Please justify your scores.  This review will be sent to the authors.*

Comments for editors

(Confidential)

 

Review form (book reviews and interviews)

  1. The overall quality of the work is: *
  2. The work requires revision:*
  3. The relevance of the work to the theme of the call for papers and the journal's scope is:*

Detailed review for the authors*

Please justify your scores. This review will be sent to the authors.

Comments for editors

(Confidential)