Citizen Science: Past, Present and Future of Public Engagement in Scientific Research
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.21814/rlec.4051Keywords:
citizen science, public engagement, motivations, research, historyAbstract
When the relationship between science and society takes on a more prominent role, initiatives that allow greater involvement and dialogue between both parties become increasingly relevant. In this context, the past decade has seen an enormous growth of a practice known as citizen science as a form of public participation in scientific research that promotes the faster advance of scientific knowledge and contributes to greater collaboration between science and society. This article presents a brief overview of the main aspects of citizen science, how this practice emerged and how it mobilised the involvement of society in the past, particularly by analysing examples related to biodiversity recording and outlining the current situation in Portugal. It includes some suggestions for developing future actions in this field, particularly studies that analyse the motivations to participate in scientific research, allowing for a more open and shared science.
Downloads
References
Aono, Y., & Kazui, K. (2008). Phenological data series of cherry tree flowering in Kyoto, Japan, and its application to reconstruction of springtime temperatures since the 9th century. International Journal of Climatology, 28, 905–914. https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1594 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/joc.1594
Bocage, J. V. B. (1862). Instrucções praticas sobre o modo de colligir, preparar e remetter productos zoologicos para o Museu de Lisboa. Imprensa Nacional.
Bocage, J. V. B. (1865). Relatorio acerca da situação e necessidades da Secçao Zoologica do Museu de Lisboa apresentado a sua excellencia o Ministro e Secretario d’Estado dos Negocios do Reino. Imprensa Nacional
Bonney, R., Ballard, H., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Phillips, T., Shirk, J., & Wilderman, C. C. (2009). Public participation in scientific research: Defining the field and assessing its potential for informal science education. A CAISE inquiry group report. Center for Advancement of Informal Science Education (CAISE).
Carolino, L., & Simões, A. (2011). The eclipse, the astronomer and his audience: Frederico Oom and the total solar eclipse of 28 May 1900 in Portugal. Annals of Science, 69(2), 215–238. https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2011.601278 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/00033790.2011.601278
Conceição, C. P., & Luís, C. (2021) Da Ciência Viva à ciência cidadã. In M. P. Diogo, C. Luís, & M. L. Sousa (Eds.), Ciência, tecnologia e medicina na construção de Portugal (Vol. IV; pp. 561–591). Tinta da China.
Dunn, E., Francis, C., Blancher, P., Drennan, S., Howe, M., Lepage, D, Robbins, C., Rosenberg, K., Sauer, J., & Smith, K. (2005). Enhancing the scientific value of The Christmas Bird Count. Auk, 122(1), 338–346. https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/122.1.338 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/auk/122.1.338
European Commission. (s.d.). Horizon 2020. https://research-and-innovation.ec.europa.eu/funding/funding-opportunities/funding-programmes-and-open-calls/horizon-2020_en
Felismino, D. (2016). D. Maria Pia, herbários, plantas secas e o gosto pela natureza. In J. A. Ribeiro (Ed.), Um olhar real. Obra artística da Rainha D. Maria Pia. Desenho, aguarela e fotografia (pp. 160–167). INCM; Palácio Nacional da Ajuda.
Gamito-Marques, D. (2018). A space of one’s own: Barbosa du Bocage, the foundation of the National Museum of Lisbon, and the construction of a career in zoology (1851–1907). Journal of the History of Biology, 51, 223–257. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-017-9487-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10739-017-9487-6
Haklay, M. (2013). Citizen science and volunteered geographic information – Overview and typology of participation. In D. Z. Sui, S. Elwood, & M.F. Goodchild (Eds.), Crowdsourcing geographic knowledge: Volunteered geographic information (VGI) in theory and practice (pp. 105–122). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-4587-2_7
Irwin, A. (1995). Citizen science: A study of people, expertise and sustainable development. Routledge.
Johnson, M. F., Hannah, C., Acton, L., Popovici, R., Karanth, K. K., & Weinthal, E. (2014). Network environmentalism: Citizen scientists as agents for environmental advocacy. Global Environmental Change, 29, 235–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.006 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2014.10.006
Kragh, G. (2016). The motivations of volunteers in citizen science. Environmental Scientist, 25(2), 32–35.
Luís, C., Conceição, C. P., Costa, A. F. & Lourenço, M. C. (2018, 3–5 de junho). Portuguese scientific community perception of citizen science [Apresentação em conferência]. Second International ECSA Conference 2018, Geneve, Switzerland.
MacGregor, A. (Ed.). (2018). Naturalists in the field: Collecting, recording and preserving the natural world from the fifteenth to the twenty-first century, emergence of natural history. Brill Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004323841
Miller-Rushing, A., Primack, R., & Bonney, R. (2012). The history of public participation in ecological research. Frontiers in Ecology and the Environment, 10, 285–290. https://doi.org/10.1890/110278 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1890/110278
Nov, O., Arazy, O., & Anderson, D. (2014). Scientists@Home: What drives the quantity and quality of online citizen science participation? PLoS One, 9(4), Artigo e90375. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090375 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090375
Paulino d’Oliveira, M. (1896). Aves da Península Ibérica e especialmente de Portugal. Imprensa da Universidade, Coimbra. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.14342
Piland, N., Castañeda, A., Varese, M., Soacha, K., Ponciano, L., D'Onofrio, G., Espitia, J. E., Luís, C., Piera, J., Plos, A., Restrepo, J. F., & Torres, D. (2020, 6–10 de setembro). Citizen science from the Iberoamerican perspective: An overview, and insights by the RICAP network. ECSA Conference 2020, Trieste, Italy.
Raddick, M. J., Bracey, G., Gay, P. L., Lintott. C. J., Murray, P., Schawinski, S. A., & Vandenberg, J. (2010). Galaxy zoo: Exploring the motivations of citizen science volunteers. Astronomy Education Review, 9, 18. https://doi.org/10.3847/AER2009036 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3847/AER2009036
Rotman, D., Preece, J., Hammock, J., Procita, K., Hansen, D., Parr, C., Lewis, D., & Jacobs, D. (2012). Dynamic changes in motivation in collaborative citizen-science projects. In Proceedings of 2012 Computer Supported Cooperative Work Conference (HCIL-2011-28) (pp. 1–10). Association for Computing Machinery, Seattle, WA. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1145/2145204.2145238
Roy, D. B., Harding, P. T., Preston, C. D., & Roy, H. E. (Eds.). (2014). Celebrating 50 years of the Biological Records Centre. Centre for Ecology & Hydrology.
Serrano-Sanz, F., Holocher-Ertl, T., Kieslinger, B., Sanz-Garcia, F., & Silva, C. G. (2014). White paper on citizen science in Europe. Socientize Consortium.
Shirk, J. L., Ballard, H. L., Wilderman, C. C., Phillips, T., Wiggins, A., Jordan, R., McCallie, E., Minarchek, M., Lewenstien, B. V., Krasny, M. E., & Bonney, R. (2012). Public participation in scientific research: A framework for deliberate design. Ecology and Society, 17(2), 29. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04705-170229 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-04705-170229
Silvertown, J. (2009). A new dawn for citizen science. Trends in Ecology & Evolution, 24(9), 467–471. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2009.03.017
Sousa, J. A. (1861). Relação das aves de Portugal existentes no Museu de Sua Magestade El-Rei Senhor D. Pedro. Gazeta Medica de Lisboa, 2, 17–21.
Tiago, P., Gouveia, M. J., Capinha, C., Santos-Reis, M., & Pereira, H. M. (2017). The influence of motivational factors on the frequency of participation in citizen science activities. Nature Conservation, 18, 61–78. https://doi.org/10.3987/natureconservation.18.13429 DOI: https://doi.org/10.3897/natureconservation.18.13429
Tian, H., Stige, L. C., Cazelles, B., Kausrud, K. L., Svarverud, R., Stenseth, N. C., & Zhang, Z. (2011). Reconstruction of a 1910-y-long locust series reveals consistent associations with climate fluctuations in China. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108, 14521–14526. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100189108 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1100189108
Vetter, J. (2011). Introduction: Lay participation in the history of scientific observation. Science in Context, 24(2),127–141. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889711000032 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0269889711000032
West, S., Dyke, A., & Pateman, R. (2021). Variations in the motivations of environmental citizen scientists. Citizen Science: Theory and Practice, 6(1), 14. https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.370 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5334/cstp.370
Wiggins, A., & Crowstone, K. (2011). From conservation to crowdsourcing: A typology of citizen science. In IEEE 2011 44th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences (HICSS 2011) (pp. 1–10). https://doi.org/10.1109/hicss.2011.207 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/HICSS.2011.207
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2022 Cristina Luís
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Authors own the copyright, providing the journal with the right of first publication. The work is licensed under a Creative Commons - Atribuição 4.0 Internacional License.